Other Resources

Links

• MTS/PEER (2018) – Hybrid Simulation Technologies & Methods for Civil Engineering
• Multihazard Engineering Collaboratory on Hybrid Simulation (MECHS)
• ETH Zürich (2016) – Hybrid2020 Symposium

Presentations

• NHERI@UF & SimCenter (2017): Cyber-Physical Systems (Schellenberg, Mahin)
• NHERI@UCSD (2016): Converting a Shake Table for Hybrid Simulation (Schellenberg)
• NHERI@Lehigh (2016): Hybrid Simulation of a Seismically Isolated Nuclear Power Plant (Schellenberg et al.)
• NHERI@Lehigh (2016): MDOF Hybrid Shake Table Testing of Response Modification Devices (Schellenberg, You, Mahin)
• JRC, Ispra (2015): MDOF Hybrid Shake Table Testing for Bridge and Building Structures (Schellenberg, You, Mahin)
• OpenSees Days Bristol (2014): OpenSees and OpenFresco Example Applications (Schellenberg)
• OpenSees Days Bristol (2014): Conducting Hybrid Simulations with OpenSees and OpenFresco (Schellenberg)
• 10NCEE (2014): Development of a Large Scale Hybrid Shake Table and Application to Testing a Friction Slider Isolated System (Schellenberg, Becker, Mahin)
• nees@berkeley (2014): Hybrid Shake Table Test of a Midlevel Seismic Isolated Structure (Schellenberg, Becker, Mahin)
• nees@berkeley (2014): Hybrid Simulation of Base Isolated Structures: 6 Degree of Freedom Model (Schellenberg, Mahin)
• Tongji University (2013): Short Course on Hybrid Simulation (Mosalam, Günay)
• 13WCSI (2013): Hybrid Shake Table for the Testing of Midlevel Seismic Isolation Systems (Schellenberg, Becker, Mahin)
• Discovering OpenSees (2013): Conducting Hybrid Simulations with OpenSees/OpenFresco (Schellenberg)
• Discovering OpenSees (2012): OpenFrescoExpress (Schellenberg)
• (2011): Force, Switched and Mixed Hybrid Simulation Control in OpenFresco (Kim, Stojadinovic)

Background Documents and Reports

• Christenson, R., et al. (2014). Hybrid Simulation: A Discussion of Current Assessment Measures. George E. Brown, Jr. Network for Earthquake Engineering Simulation, Purdue University.
• Nakata, N., et al. (2014). Hybrid Simulation Primer and Dictionary. George E. Brown, Jr. Network for Earthquake Engineering Simulation, Purdue University.
• Del Carpio Ramos, M., et al. (2014). Hybrid Simulation of the Seismic Response of a Steel Moment Frame Building Structure through Collapse. Technical Report MCEER-14-0003, Multi-Hazard Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University at Buffalo.
• Schellenberg, A.H., et al. (2009). Advanced Implementation of Hybrid Simulation. Report UCB/PEER-09/104, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley.
• Mosqueda, G., et al. (2005). Implementation and accuracy of continuous hybrid simulation with geographically distributed substructures. Report UCB/EERC-05/02, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley.
• Thewalt, C.R. and Mahin, S.A. (1987). Hybrid solutions techniques for generalized pseudodynamic testing. Report UCB/EERC-87/09, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley.
• Dermitzakis, S.N. and Mahin, S.A. (1985). Development of substructuring techniques for on-line computer controlled seismic performance testing. Report UCB/EERC-85/04, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley.
• Shing, P.B. and Mahin, S.A. (1984). Pseudodynamic test method for seismic performance evaluation: theory and implementation. Report UCB/EERC-84/01, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley.
• Shing, P.B. and Mahin, S.A. (1983). Experimental error propagation in pseudodynamic testing. Report UCB/EERC-83/12, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley.